Question: When Should Code Review Be Done?

How should a code review be done?

Best Practices for Code ReviewReview fewer than 400 lines of code at a time.

Take your time.

Do not review for more than 60 minutes at a time.

Set goals and capture metrics.

Authors should annotate source code before the review.

Use checklists.

Establish a process for fixing defects found.

Foster a positive code review culture.More items….

Who should review code?

Developers should do code reviews. They should do code reviews, because they should know the code, the company style standards and practices. By having someone else do code reviews, you are telling your developers that it’s not their responsibility to make sure the code meets the companies standards.

Does Google use Gerrit?

For open-source code and code shared with collaborators outside, like Go, Chromium, Android Googlers use the Gerrit code review tool. Gerrit is an open-source code review tool that integrates with Git. For the internal code, on the other hand, Googlers use an internal code review tool called Critique.

What are two features of the formal code review?

Formal Code Review The Fagan inspection consists of six steps: Planning, Overview, Preparation, Inspection Meeting, Rework and Follow-up. The basic idea is to define output requirements for each step upfront and when running through the process, you inspect the output of each step and compare it to the desired outcome.

How many types of code review techniques are there?

Types. Code review practices fall into three main categories: pair programming, formal code review and lightweight code review.

Why do we do code review?

Code review helps give a fresh set of eyes to identify bugs and simple coding errors before your product gets to the next step, making the process for getting the software to the customer more efficient. Simply reviewing someone’s code and identifying errors is great.

How does code review work?

Good code reviews look at the change itself and how it fits into the codebase. They will look through the clarity of the title and description and “why” of the change. They cover the correctness of the code, test coverage, functionality changes, and confirm that they follow the coding guides and best practices.

Are code reviews worth it?

Talk with developers who use a tool for code review and you’ll find they are much happier than their counterparts who aren’t. Most happy, however, are the developer managers that can use the tool to measure the team’s quality and improvements. For all of them, the time spent is well worth it.

What does code review mean?

Code Review, or Peer Code Review, is the act of consciously and systematically convening with one’s fellow programmers to check each other’s code for mistakes, and has been repeatedly shown to accelerate and streamline the process of software development like few other practices can.

What is good code quality?

Good quality of code makes sure that codes are written in such a way that makes them highly readable. The use of comments, proper indentation, clear notations, and simplicity in the flow are some factors. Editing code is also a more comfortable job with high-quality code as they are easy to read and implement changes.

What is difference between Git and Gerrit?

While GitHub supports multiple commits in one pull request, Gerrit does not. The fundamentals of Gerrit is closer to the git request-pull way of thinking (the built in way to create “pull requests” within git – not to be confused with GitHub pull requests). … You’ve just created your first Gerrit code review.

Why is Gerrit used?

Gerrit is a web-based tool that is used for code review. Its main features are the side-by-side difference viewing and inline commenting, which makes code reviews a quick and simple task. … Gerrit allows authorized contributors to merge Changes to the Git repository, after reviews are done.

What is git used for?

Git is the most commonly used version control system. Git tracks the changes you make to files, so you have a record of what has been done, and you can revert to specific versions should you ever need to. Git also makes collaboration easier, allowing changes by multiple people to all be merged into one source.